Sarah Tick
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
Papers in
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 7
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments 5
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 1
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Florence Rossant (2 shared papers)G. Soubrane (3 shared papers)Itebeddine Ghorbel (2 shared papers)Michel Pâques (3 shared papers)G. Coscas (2 shared papers)Eric H. Souied (3 shared papers)José‐Alain Sahel (7 shared papers)Florence Coscas (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Ophthalmology (2 papers)Retina (2 papers)Acta Ophthalmologica (1 paper)BioMed Research International (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sarah Tick
18 papers receiving 514 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Ophthalmology 312
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 170
- Biomedical Engineering 73
- Biophysics 7
- Neurology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Tick
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Tick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Tick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Tick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Tick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Tick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Tick. The network helps show where Sarah Tick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Tick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 183 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 136 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 0 |
About Sarah Tick
Sarah Tick is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 21 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (5 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper) and Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (312 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (170 citations), Biomedical Engineering (73 citations), Biophysics (7 citations) and Neurology (8 citations). Sarah Tick has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Florence Rossant, G. Soubrane, Itebeddine Ghorbel, Michel Pâques, G. Coscas, Eric H. Souied, José‐Alain Sahel, Florence Coscas, Philippe Chaumet‐Riffaud and Alain Gaudric. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Retina, Acta Ophthalmologica, BioMed Research International and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.