M.F. Escaño
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Corneal surgery and disorders
Papers in
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 4
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 2
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 5
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 4
- Co-authors
- Akira Negi (8 shared papers)Makoto Nakamura (3 shared papers)Hidetaka Maeda (3 shared papers)Akiyasu Kanamori (3 shared papers)Ryu Seya (2 shared papers)Sentaro Kusuhara (4 shared papers)Kazuki Ishibashi (3 shared papers)Hiroyuki Yamamoto (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Ophthalmology (4 papers)Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (2 papers)Experimental Eye Research (2 papers)Ophthalmologica (1 paper)Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Japan
In The Last Decade
M.F. Escaño
11 papers receiving 738 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Ophthalmology 675
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 509
- Neurology 85
- Biomedical Engineering 120
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 33
Countries citing papers authored by M.F. Escaño
This map shows the geographic impact of M.F. Escaño's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.F. Escaño with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.F. Escaño more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.F. Escaño
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.F. Escaño. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.F. Escaño. The network helps show where M.F. Escaño may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.F. Escaño, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 288 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 151 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 127 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 81 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 9 | Differential expression of neuroendocrine-specific protein in form-deprived chick eyes. | 2000 | 13 |
| 10 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 9 |
About M.F. Escaño
M.F. Escaño is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Oncology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Connexins and lens biology (2 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (675 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (509 citations), Neurology (85 citations), Biomedical Engineering (120 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (33 citations). M.F. Escaño has collaborated with scholars based in Japan. Frequent co-authors include Akira Negi, Makoto Nakamura, Hidetaka Maeda, Akiyasu Kanamori, Ryu Seya, Sentaro Kusuhara, Kazuki Ishibashi, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Ayako Nagai and Yasutaka Nakanishi. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, Experimental Eye Research, Ophthalmologica and Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.