Sarah Rush
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
-
- Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
- Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Papers in
- Genetics 10
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 10
-
- Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies 2
- Melanoma and MAPK Pathways 2
- Co-authors
- Nicholas K. Foreman (7 shared papers)Arthur Liu (1 shared paper)Michael K. Cooper (2 shared papers)J. Gerardo Valadez (2 shared papers)Ty W. Abel (2 shared papers)Andrew M. Donson (4 shared papers)Diane K. Birks (3 shared papers)Neil L. McNinch (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neuro-Oncology (3 papers)Neuro-Oncology (3 papers)Policing An International Journal (1 paper)Oncogene (1 paper)Kidney Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Sarah Rush
24 papers receiving 406 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Genetics 205
- Neurology 80
- Ophthalmology 32
- Cancer Research 30
- Molecular Biology 140
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Rush
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Rush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Rush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Rush. The network helps show where Sarah Rush may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 107 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 8 | Phenotypic characterization of the human fibrous histiocytoma giant cell tumor (GCT) cell line and its cytokine repertoire. | 1993 | 18 |
| 9 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 2 |
About Sarah Rush
Sarah Rush is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (2 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (2 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (2 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (2 papers) and Respiratory viral infections research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (205 citations), Neurology (80 citations), Ophthalmology (32 citations), Cancer Research (30 citations) and Molecular Biology (140 citations). Sarah Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas K. Foreman, Arthur Liu, Michael K. Cooper, J. Gerardo Valadez, Ty W. Abel, Andrew M. Donson, Diane K. Birks, Neil L. McNinch, Bette K. Kleinschmidt‐DeMasters and Laura Z. Fenton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Neuro-Oncology, Policing An International Journal, Oncogene and Kidney Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.