Sarah Rees

810 citations
52 papers · 360 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Rees

48 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Sarah Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 227
  • Geometry and Topology 203
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 146
  • Mathematical Physics 78
  • Algebra and Number Theory 33
Replace László Pyber with:
László Pyber Hungary
В. А. Романьков Russia
А. А. Иванов Poland
Alberto Del Fra Italy
Norbert Seifter Austria
Péter P. Pálfy Hungary
Сергей Иванович Адян Russia
A. H. Rhemtulla Canada
Alexander Hulpke United States
Allan Steel Australia
Sarah Rees relative to László Pyber Hungary László Pyber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
László Pyber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Rees. The network helps show where Sarah Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Rees Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199483
2 199124
3 200521
4 199620
5 199619
6 199319
7 201115
8 200012
9 201711
10 198511
11 200710
12 19889
13 20018
14 19928
15 20167
16 20136
17 19995
18 19855
19 20074
20 20034

About Sarah Rees

Sarah Rees is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 52 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (28 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (22 papers), semigroups and automata theory (22 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (9 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (7 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (6 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (5 papers) and graph theory and CDMA systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (227 citations), Geometry and Topology (203 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (146 citations), Mathematical Physics (78 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (33 citations). Sarah Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Derek F. Holt, E. A. O’Brien, C. R. Leedham-Green, George Havas, D. B. A. Epstein, Susan Hermiller, Francis Buekenhout, Leonard H. Soicher, Richard M. Thomas and Robert H. Gilman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, International Journal of Algebra and Computation, Mathematics of Computation, Geometriae Dedicata and Journal of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact