Sarah E. Graham

30 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Graham
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Endocrinology 34
  • Molecular Medicine 31
  • Epidemiology 140
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 57
  • Communication 24
Replace Andrew M. Davenport with:
Andrew M. Davenport United States
Patrick R. Connelly United States
Divya Tiwari United States
Mary E. Harris United States
Clément Paris France
Elizabeth Cunningham United States
Alison Smith United Kingdom
Cecilia Sarto Italy
C. Zhang China
Shoji Kawasaki Japan
Sarah E. Graham relative to Andrew M. Davenport United States Andrew M. Davenport's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrew M. Davenport · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Graham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Graham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Graham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Graham. The network helps show where Sarah E. Graham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Graham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Graham Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Graham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020166
2 201545
3 201639
4 201839
5 201439
6 201936
7 201233
8 198825
9 202121
10 201620
11 202219
12 202114
13 201014
14 201714
15 200612
16 20229
17 20167
18 20207
19 20165
20 20155

About Sarah E. Graham

Sarah E. Graham is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations, Oncology, Endocrinology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 589 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (2 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (2 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (34 citations), Molecular Medicine (31 citations), Epidemiology (140 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (57 citations) and Communication (24 citations). Sarah E. Graham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Heather A. Carlson, Cristen J. Willer, Xiaokun Wang, Wanqing Liu, Y. Eugene Chen, Yang Zhang, Roger Piqué-Regi, Zhipeng Liu, X. Charlie Dong and Menghao Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Diplomatic History, Public Health, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics and Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact