Sarah E. Decker

29 papers receiving 855 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Decker
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Biological Psychiatry 24
  • Hematology 103
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 126
  • Genetics 83
  • Infectious Diseases 114
Replace Paola Mina‐Osorio with:
Paola Mina‐Osorio United States
Rajarshi Sengupta United States
Abhishek Shastri United Kingdom
Ariel F. Martinez United States
Maria Stella Vari Italy
Annette Sauter Switzerland
Kazem Nouri Austria
Charles Hillier United Kingdom
Fabiana B. Kohlrausch Brazil
Tejaswi Kandula Australia
Sarah E. Decker relative to Paola Mina‐Osorio United States Paola Mina‐Osorio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Paola Mina‐Osorio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Decker. The network helps show where Sarah E. Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Decker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Decker Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Decker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003106
2 201567
3 201766
4 201465
5 200051
6 201648
7 201644
8 201137
9 200635
10 201335
11 201635
12 201432
13 201728
14 201028
15 200627
16 201824
17 201724
18 200522
19 201720
20 200614

About Sarah E. Decker

Sarah E. Decker is a scholar working on Hematology, Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Oncology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 871 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (7 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (6 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (6 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers) and Mercury impact and mitigation studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (24 citations), Hematology (103 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (126 citations), Genetics (83 citations) and Infectious Diseases (114 citations). Sarah E. Decker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Robert S. Levy, Rif S. El‐Mallakh, Mary O. Huff, Christine Dierks, Xiaoping Li, Gundel Harms, Stefanie Theuring, John Rubaihayo, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye and John N. Forrest. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Leukemia, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact