Sarah Cotterill

84 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Sarah Cotterill
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • General Decision Sciences 37
  • Applied Psychology 87
  • Public Administration 60
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 106
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 118
Replace Rachel Baker with:
Rachel Baker United Kingdom
Courtney Kennedy United States
Richard T. Curtin United States
Erin L. O’Connor Australia
Nicolas R. Ziebarth United States
David Halpern United Kingdom
Leslie M. Harris United States
Jennifer M. Mellor United States
J. Paul Leigh United States
Henry Saffer United States
Sarah Cotterill relative to Rachel Baker United Kingdom Rachel Baker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Rachel Baker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Cotterill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Cotterill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Cotterill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Cotterill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Cotterill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Cotterill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Cotterill. The network helps show where Sarah Cotterill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Cotterill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Cotterill Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Cotterill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018103
2 2007103
3 201893
4 201186
5 201866
6
Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think: Experimenting with Ways to Change Civic Behaviour
201166
7 201160
8 201941
9 202037
10 202136
11 201933
12 200933
13 202032
14 200331
15 201631
16 201931
17 201827
18 201725
19 202125
20 202123

About Sarah Cotterill

Sarah Cotterill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Clinical Psychology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Education (10 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (7 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (37 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations), Public Administration (60 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (106 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (118 citations). Sarah Cotterill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Peter John, Stephen F. King, Nia Coupe, Liz Richardson, Sarah Peters, Peter Bower, David French, Hisako Nomura, Jack S. Benton and Jamie Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, Journal of Medical Internet Research, BMJ Open, Clinical Rehabilitation and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact