Sarah Biber
Impact in
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect behavior and control techniques
- Horticulture top 2%
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Papers in
-
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 2
- Insect and Pesticide Research 1
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 1
-
- Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology 1
- Co-authors
- Seth R. Bordenstein (2 shared papers)Hervé Tettelin (2 shared papers)Julie C. Dunning Hotopp (2 shared papers)John H. Werren (2 shared papers)Martin Maiden (1 shared paper)Keith A. Jolley (1 shared paper)Laura Baldo (1 shared paper)Cheryl Y. Hayashi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (3 papers)Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (1 paper)Applied and Environmental Microbiology (1 paper)PLoS Genetics (1 paper)Microbiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Sarah Biber
5 papers receiving 761 citations
Sarah Biber's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Insect Science 710
- Horticulture 51
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 89
- Genetics 117
- Infectious Diseases 54
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Biber
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Biber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Biber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Biber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Biber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Biber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Biber. The network helps show where Sarah Biber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Biber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multilocus Sequence Typing System for the EndosymbiontWolbachia pipientis Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 680 |
| 2 | 2009 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 0 |
About Sarah Biber
Sarah Biber is a scholar working on Insect Science, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cell Biology and Physiology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (1 paper), Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (1 paper), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper), Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (710 citations), Horticulture (51 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (89 citations), Genetics (117 citations) and Infectious Diseases (54 citations). Sarah Biber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Seth R. Bordenstein, Hervé Tettelin, Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, John H. Werren, Martin Maiden, Keith A. Jolley, Laura Baldo, Cheryl Y. Hayashi, Kostas Bourtzis and Vishvanath Nene. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, PLoS Genetics and Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.