Sarah Ackroyd
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Papers in
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 6
-
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 3
- Co-authors
- Deborah J. Wexler (2 shared papers)Hilary K. Seligman (1 shared paper)Seth A. Berkowitz (1 shared paper)Andrew J. Karter (1 shared paper)Giselle Corbie‐Smith (1 shared paper)Steven J. Atlas (1 shared paper)Nita K. Lee (6 shared papers)Paul Harper (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gynecologic Oncology (6 papers)American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)Fertility and Sterility (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Sarah Ackroyd
22 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Reproductive Medicine 51
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 41
- Pharmacy 16
- General Health Professions 84
- Aging 6
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Ackroyd
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Ackroyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Ackroyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Ackroyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Ackroyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Ackroyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Ackroyd. The network helps show where Sarah Ackroyd may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Ackroyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 129 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 1 |
About Sarah Ackroyd
Sarah Ackroyd is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 24 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (51 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (41 citations), Pharmacy (16 citations), General Health Professions (84 citations) and Aging (6 citations). Sarah Ackroyd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Deborah J. Wexler, Hilary K. Seligman, Seth A. Berkowitz, Andrew J. Karter, Giselle Corbie‐Smith, Steven J. Atlas, Nita K. Lee, Paul Harper, Elbert S. Huang and Katherine C. Kurnit. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nature Communications, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Fertility and Sterility.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.