Sara Rydh
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Papers in
-
- Sleep and related disorders 3
-
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Brjánn Ljótsson (5 shared papers)Gerhard Andersson (2 shared papers)Nils Lindefors (2 shared papers)Erik Hedman‐Lagerlöf (2 shared papers)Erik Andersson (2 shared papers)Christian Rück (2 shared papers)Viktor Kaldo (3 shared papers)Kerstin Blom (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology (1 paper)Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (1 paper)BMC Psychiatry (1 paper)Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (1 paper)Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Sweden
In The Last Decade
Sara Rydh
5 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Applied Psychology 133
- Gastroenterology 91
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 147
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 20
- Pharmacy 12
Countries citing papers authored by Sara Rydh
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Rydh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Rydh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Rydh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Rydh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Rydh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Rydh. The network helps show where Sara Rydh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Sara Rydh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 161 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 111 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 106 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 6 | KBT-baserad självhjälpsbehandling vid insomni - en effektstudie | 2008 | 0 |
About Sara Rydh
Sara Rydh is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gastroenterology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (1 paper) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (133 citations), Gastroenterology (91 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (147 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (20 citations) and Pharmacy (12 citations). Sara Rydh has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Brjánn Ljótsson, Gerhard Andersson, Nils Lindefors, Erik Hedman‐Lagerlöf, Erik Andersson, Christian Rück, Viktor Kaldo, Kerstin Blom, Perjohan Lindfors and John Axelsson. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, BMC Psychiatry, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology and Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.