Sara O’Donnell

469 citations
17 papers · 341 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Sara O’Donnell

17 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Sara O’Donnell
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • General Decision Sciences 54
  • Applied Psychology 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 99
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Clinical Psychology 47
Replace Karolin Gieseler with:
Karolin Gieseler Germany
Franziska Meißner Germany
Bryan A. Castelda United States
Deanna C. Whelan Canada
Zoë Francis Canada
Hanna Suh United States
Paul Kyuman Chae South Korea
Nils-Torge Telle Germany
Andrew Luttrell United States
Kyle Nash Canada
Sara O’Donnell relative to Karolin Gieseler Germany Karolin Gieseler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Karolin Gieseler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara O’Donnell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara O’Donnell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara O’Donnell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara O’Donnell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara O’Donnell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara O’Donnell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara O’Donnell. The network helps show where Sara O’Donnell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Sara O’Donnell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara O’Donnell Line = papers co-authored together Sara O’Donnell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201779
2 201855
3 201731
4 201829
5 201928
6 201824
7 201215
8 201915
9 201814
10 200910
11 20219
12 20119
13 20098
14 20208
15
The Tyranny of Tradition: How information paradigms limit librarians’ teaching and student scholarship
20134
16 20172
17 20211

About Sara O’Donnell

Sara O’Donnell is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Clinical Psychology and Physiology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Physical Activity and Health (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (54 citations), Applied Psychology (102 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations) and Clinical Psychology (47 citations). Sara O’Donnell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Leonard H. Epstein, Tinuke Oluyomi Daniel, Kelseanna Hollis‐Hansen, Jeffrey Belkora, Haruka Minami, Matthew D. Scalco, Ana M. Abrantes, Jennifer P. Read, Nancy Johnson and Dawn Stacey. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Appetite, Physiology & Behavior, Addictive Behaviors and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact