Sara Nabil

736 citations
51 papers · 566 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 37
    • Interactive and Immersive Displays 29
    • Usability and User Interface Design 3
    • Crafts, Textile, and Design 9

Sara Nabil

47 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

Sara Nabil
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Human-Computer Interaction 411
  • Museology 100
  • Architecture 24
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 113
  • Demography 51
Replace Lee Jones with:
Lee Jones Canada
Hannah Perner-Wilson United States
Irene Posch Austria
Clement Zheng United States
Jim Budd United States
Martin Murer Austria
Lea Albaugh United States
Heekyoung Jung United States
Bahareh Barati Netherlands
Joanna Maria Berzowska Canada
Sara Nabil relative to Lee Jones Canada Lee Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Lee Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Nabil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Nabil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Nabil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Nabil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Nabil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Nabil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Nabil. The network helps show where Sara Nabil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara Nabil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Nabil Line = papers co-authored together Sara Nabil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202071
2 201964
3 202139
4 202137
5 201835
6 202126
7 201725
8 201723
9 202319
10 202018
11 202217
12 201816
13 202414
14 202313
15 202312
16 202011
17 202311
18 202410
19 202110
20 20179

About Sara Nabil

Sara Nabil is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Museology, Demography, Cognitive Neuroscience and Conservation, having authored 51 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (37 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (29 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (9 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (7 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers) and Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (411 citations), Museology (100 citations), Architecture (24 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (113 citations) and Demography (51 citations). Sara Nabil has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lee Jones, Audrey Girouard, David S. Kirk, Peter R. Wright, Miriam Sturdee, Jan Kučera, Thomas Plötz, Simon J. Bowen, Ahmed Awad and Jason I. Alexander. Their work appears in journals such as Interaction design & architecture(s), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, interactions, Lecture notes in computer science and Communications in computer and information science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact