Sara Hellmüller

478 citations
28 papers · 200 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Sara Hellmüller

27 papers receiving 166 citations

Peers

Sara Hellmüller
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Development 30
  • Political Science and International Relations 123
  • Sociology and Political Science 177
  • Gender Studies 16
  • Occupational Therapy 2
Replace Stéfanie von Hlatky with:
Stéfanie von Hlatky Canada
SungYong Lee New Zealand
Emily Paddon Rhoads United States
Nadine Ansorg Germany
Justin Morris United Kingdom
Norrie MacQueen United Kingdom
Niels Terpstra Netherlands
Vincent Durac Ireland
Merve Erdilmen Canada
Mona El-Ghobashy United States
Sara Hellmüller relative to Stéfanie von Hlatky Canada Stéfanie von Hlatky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Stéfanie von Hlatky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Hellmüller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Hellmüller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Hellmüller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Hellmüller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Hellmüller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Hellmüller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Hellmüller. The network helps show where Sara Hellmüller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Sara Hellmüller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Hellmüller Line = papers co-authored together Sara Hellmüller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201324
2 202017
3 202217
4 202217
5 201715
6 202113
7 202313
8 202012
9 20129
10
Are Mediators Norm Entrepreneurs? Exploring the Role of Mediators in Norm Diffusion
20178
11 20217
12 20236
13 20225
14 20255
15 20234
16 20194
17 20234
18 20254
19 20223
20 20163

About Sara Hellmüller

Sara Hellmüller is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Development and Anthropology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peacebuilding and International Security (23 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (15 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (13 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (5 papers), International Development and Aid (4 papers), Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones (1 paper), Middle East Politics and Society (1 paper) and Global and Cross-Cultural Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (30 citations), Political Science and International Relations (123 citations), Sociology and Political Science (177 citations), Gender Studies (16 citations) and Occupational Therapy (2 citations). Sara Hellmüller has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Oliver P. Richmond, Corinne Bara, Laurent Goetschel and Marie‐Joëlle Zahar. Their work appears in journals such as International Negotiation, Contemporary Security Policy, Swiss Political Science Review, International Affairs and International Journal of Conflict Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact