International Negotiation

621 papers and 5.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 621 papers published in International Negotiation in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in International Negotiation usually cover Sociology and Political Science (365 papers), Political Science and International Relations (291 papers) and Development (70 papers) specifically the topics of Peacebuilding and International Security (138 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (121 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Negotiation are I. William Zartman, Herbert C. Kelman, Marwa Daoudy, Rachel Croson, Larry Crump, Isak Svensson, Pruitt, Daniel Druckman, Peter Drahos and Jacob Bercovitch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Negotiation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Negotiation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Negotiation.

Countries where authors publish in International Negotiation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Negotiation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Negotiation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Negotiation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025