Sara E. Johnson

1.7k citations
45 papers · 981 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Sara E. Johnson

41 papers receiving 927 citations

Peers

Sara E. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Developmental Biology 105
  • Social Psychology 320
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 172
  • Gender Studies 73
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 153
Replace Oskar Bürger with:
Oskar Bürger United States
George Chaplin United States
John H. Relethford United States
Emma Foster United Kingdom
Margaret Harris United Kingdom
B. Derrick Taff United States
Sarah Harrison United States
Michael Cunningham United States
Julienne N. Rutherford United States
Jean‐Pierre Bocquet‐Appel France
Sara E. Johnson relative to Oskar Bürger United States Oskar Bürger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Oskar Bürger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara E. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara E. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara E. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara E. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara E. Johnson. The network helps show where Sara E. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara E. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara E. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Sara E. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004189
2 1995122
3 200297
4 201393
5 200472
6 201259
7 200254
8 201341
9 200436
10 200828
11 201026
12 202124
13 200921
14 201617
15 20089
16 20178
17 20198
18 20138
19 19887
20 19896

About Sara E. Johnson

Sara E. Johnson is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Surgery, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 981 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Cells and Metastasis (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (4 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers) and Hernia repair and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (105 citations), Social Psychology (320 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (172 citations), Gender Studies (73 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (153 citations). Sara E. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Sudan and Brunei. Frequent co-authors include John Bock, Hexin Chen, Pang‐Kuo Lo, Jane B. Lancaster, Hillard Kaplan, Robert M. Seyfarth, Julia Fischer, Ryne A. Palombit, Thore J. Bergman and Dawn M. Kitchen. Their work appears in journals such as Human Nature, Surgical Endoscopy, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Scientific Reports and Schizophrenia Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact