Sara E. Branch

21 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Sara E. Branch
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Literature and Literary Theory 73
  • Safety Research 51
  • Social Psychology 111
  • Architecture 7
  • Applied Psychology 20
Replace Ellen A. Stevens with:
Ellen A. Stevens United States
Norma S. Guerra United States
Janet N. Ahn United States
Oqab Alrashidi Australia
Matthew D. Lovelace United States
Jeffrey Hugh Gamble Taiwan
Leyton Schnellert Canada
Ofra Nevo Israel
Christina R. Bonney United States
Susan R. Wynn United States
Sara E. Branch relative to Ellen A. Stevens United States Ellen A. Stevens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Ellen A. Stevens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara E. Branch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara E. Branch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara E. Branch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara E. Branch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara E. Branch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara E. Branch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara E. Branch. The network helps show where Sara E. Branch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara E. Branch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara E. Branch Line = papers co-authored together Sara E. Branch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201263
2 201340
3 201732
4 201630
5 201522
6 201419
7 201219
8 201518
9 201511
10 202111
11
A strategic blueprint for the alignment of doctoral competencies with disciplinary expectations
20168
12 20198
13 20188
14 20186
15 20205
16 20164
17 20154
18 20132
19 20202
20
Rule, role and value orientations as motivations for engineering
20091

About Sara E. Branch

Sara E. Branch is a scholar working on Media Technology, Social Psychology, Safety Research, Literature and Literary Theory and Architecture, having authored 22 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (6 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers), Career Development and Diversity (5 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers), Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (3 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (73 citations), Safety Research (51 citations), Social Psychology (111 citations), Architecture (7 citations) and Applied Psychology (20 citations). Sara E. Branch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and China. Frequent co-authors include William G. Graziano, Anna Woodcock, Erina L. Farrell, Demetra Evangelou, Ida B. Ngambeki, Lisa Mary Guntzviller, Christopher R. Agnew, Kari M. Wilson, Meara M. Habashi and Janice R. Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Journal of Engineering Education, Psychology of Popular Media Culture and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact