Sara E. Boucher

518 citations
19 papers · 366 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Sara E. Boucher

19 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

Sara E. Boucher
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 173
  • Clinical Psychology 45
  • Applied Psychology 9
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25
  • Pharmacy 8
Replace Given Hapunda with:
Given Hapunda Zambia
Heike Saßmann Germany
Cindy Lybarger United States
Lindsey E. G. Weil United States
Michael Swinyard United States
Marie Clark United Kingdom
Stéphanie C. Boyer Canada
Hannah Rogers United States
Carol Percy United Kingdom
Heleen Westland Netherlands
Sara E. Boucher relative to Given Hapunda Zambia Given Hapunda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Given Hapunda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara E. Boucher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara E. Boucher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara E. Boucher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara E. Boucher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara E. Boucher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara E. Boucher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara E. Boucher. The network helps show where Sara E. Boucher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara E. Boucher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara E. Boucher Line = papers co-authored together Sara E. Boucher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201957
2 201944
3 201639
4 202037
5 201928
6 201422
7 201919
8 201916
9 201916
10 201616
11 201914
12 201814
13 201913
14 20208
15
Token monetary incentives improve mail survey response rates and participant retention: results from a large randomised prospective study of mid-age New Zealand women.
20158
16 20218
17 20204
18 20202
19 20211

About Sara E. Boucher

Sara E. Boucher is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (10 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Diabetes and associated disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (173 citations), Clinical Psychology (45 citations), Applied Psychology (9 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25 citations) and Pharmacy (8 citations). Sara E. Boucher has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin J. Wheeler, Andrew Gray, Barbara C. Galland, Sarah Lovell, Esko Wiltshire, Martin de Bock, Andrew Reynolds, Caroline C. Horwath, Paul A. Tomlinson and Tracy L. Tylka. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Acta Diabetologica, Pediatric Diabetes, Behavioral Sleep Medicine and Diabetic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact