Sandra Peláez

1.3k citations
57 papers · 745 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Sandra Peláez

52 papers receiving 721 citations

Peers

Sandra Peláez
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Family Practice 28
  • Clinical Psychology 191
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 110
  • General Health Professions 152
  • Health 50
Replace José Ramón Martínez Riera with:
José Ramón Martínez Riera Spain
Rebekah Hamilton United States
Kristi D. Graves United States
Rebecca Stack United Kingdom
Meghan C. Halley United States
Julia A. Files United States
Janine Pierret France
Elyse Shuk United States
Ruth Rechis United States
Lori H. Erby United States
Sandra Peláez relative to José Ramón Martínez Riera Spain José Ramón Martínez Riera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
José Ramón Martínez Riera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Peláez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Peláez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Peláez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Peláez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Peláez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Peláez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Peláez. The network helps show where Sandra Peláez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Peláez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Peláez Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Peláez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021119
2 201769
3 201560
4 201559
5 202025
6 202125
7 201723
8 201621
9 201619
10 201818
11 201817
12 202316
13 202116
14 201916
15 201416
16
Reasons for non-participation in scleroderma support groups.
201714
17 201914
18 202313
19 201913
20 201913

About Sandra Peláez

Sandra Peláez is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Dermatology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 57 papers that have together received 745 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (15 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (7 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (28 citations), Clinical Psychology (191 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (110 citations), General Health Professions (152 citations) and Health (50 citations). Sandra Peláez has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Merry, Kim Lavoie, Nancy Edwards, Simon Bacon, Li‐Anne Audet, Sonia Angela Castiglione, Stéphanie Tremblay, Nathan Grant Smith, Brett D. Thombs and Annett Körner. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Cancers, Health Expectations, Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders and Clinical Rheumatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact