Sandra Chanraud

3.1k citations
57 papers · 2.4k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Sandra Chanraud

54 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Sandra Chanraud
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 404
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 591
  • Neurology 304
  • Neurology 139
Replace Anne‐Lise Pitel with:
Anne‐Lise Pitel France
Eva M. Müller‐Oehring United States
Diana Tordesillas‐Gutiérrez Spain
Inge K. Amlien Norway
Naama Barnea‐Goraly United States
Susan James United Kingdom
Fábio Duran Brazil
Rosemary Fama United States
Woo‐Suk Tae South Korea
Xinyu Hu China
Sandra Chanraud relative to Anne‐Lise Pitel France Anne‐Lise Pitel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Anne‐Lise Pitel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Chanraud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Chanraud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Chanraud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Chanraud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Chanraud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Chanraud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Chanraud. The network helps show where Sandra Chanraud may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Chanraud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Chanraud Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Chanraud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006341
2 2010197
3 2011171
4 2007143
5 201097
6 201290
7 202088
8 200984
9 200876
10 200674
11 201372
12 201270
13 201463
14 201059
15 201058
16 201257
17 200552
18 200952
19 201946
20 201045

About Sandra Chanraud

Sandra Chanraud is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (26 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (404 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (591 citations), Neurology (304 citations) and Neurology (139 citations). Sandra Chanraud has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Edith V. Sullivan, Adolf Pfefferbaum, Anne‐Lise Pitel, Jean‐Luc Martinot, Natalie M. Zahr, Catherine Martelli, Michel Reynaud, Torsten Rohlfing, Henri‐Jean Aubin and Gwenaëlle Douaud. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychology Review, Cerebral Cortex, Neuropsychopharmacology, Neurobiology of Aging and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact