Sandhya Ghai

806 citations
57 papers · 536 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Sandhya Ghai

46 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Sandhya Ghai
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 78
  • Epidemiology 135
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 17
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 31
  • Emergency Medical Services 14
Replace Daniel Vail with:
Daniel Vail United States
Julie Smith Denmark
M. Pierce United Kingdom
Tim Carey United States
Claudia Zeballos‐Palacios United States
Hakan Demirci Türkiye
Clarissa Gutiérrez Carvalho Brazil
Maliheh Kadivar Iran
Sarah White United States
Hassan Eftekhar Iran
Sandhya Ghai relative to Daniel Vail United States Daniel Vail's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Daniel Vail · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandhya Ghai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandhya Ghai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandhya Ghai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandhya Ghai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandhya Ghai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandhya Ghai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandhya Ghai. The network helps show where Sandhya Ghai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandhya Ghai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandhya Ghai Line = papers co-authored together Sandhya Ghai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019138
2 201632
3 201928
4 202027
5 201726
6 202026
7 201826
8 201225
9 201819
10 201418
11 201718
12 201716
13 201215
14 201814
15 201911
16 20129
17 20188
18 20177
19
Attitude of Nursing Students Towards Psychoactive Substance Use: Does Training Matter?
20126
20 20206

About Sandhya Ghai

Sandhya Ghai is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Emergency Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Well-being Studies (5 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (4 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (4 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (78 citations), Epidemiology (135 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (17 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (31 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (14 citations). Sandhya Ghai has collaborated with scholars based in India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sukhpal Kaur, Nadiya Krishnan, Nitasha Sharma, Manju Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam Dhandapani, Nitasha Sharma, Rajesh Vijayvergiya, Sandeep Grover, Prue Talbot and Manju Mohanty. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Stroke, Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, European Journal of Cancer and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact