Samuel E. Champer
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Insect behavior and control techniques
-
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Papers in
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 8
-
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 5
- Co-authors
- Jackson Champer (10 shared papers)Philipp W. Messer (11 shared papers)Andrew G. Clark (6 shared papers)Isabel K. Kim (4 shared papers)Chen Liu (1 shared paper)Jingxian Liu (2 shared papers)Pablo García‐Díaz (1 shared paper)Jie Du (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- eLife (2 papers)Methods in Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)ACS Synthetic Biology (1 paper)Evolutionary Applications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Samuel E. Champer
11 papers receiving 338 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Insect Science 174
- Genetics 139
- Molecular Biology 275
- Business and International Management 7
- Aging 4
Countries citing papers authored by Samuel E. Champer
This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel E. Champer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel E. Champer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel E. Champer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel E. Champer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel E. Champer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel E. Champer. The network helps show where Samuel E. Champer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Samuel E. Champer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 81 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 3 |
About Samuel E. Champer
Samuel E. Champer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Genetics, Ecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (8 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (5 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (174 citations), Genetics (139 citations), Molecular Biology (275 citations), Business and International Management (7 citations) and Aging (4 citations). Samuel E. Champer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Jackson Champer, Philipp W. Messer, Andrew G. Clark, Isabel K. Kim, Chen Liu, Jingxian Liu, Pablo García‐Díaz, Jie Du, Peter L. Ralph and Neil J. Gemmell. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Ecology and Evolution, ACS Synthetic Biology and Evolutionary Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.