Jackson Champer
Impact in
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Dermatology top 2%
- Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Papers in
-
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 26
- Insect behavior and control techniques 4
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 42
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 6
- Co-authors
- Philipp W. Messer (20 shared papers)Andrew G. Clark (14 shared papers)Omar S. Akbari (2 shared papers)Anna B. Buchman (1 shared paper)Jingxian Liu (7 shared papers)Chen Liu (6 shared papers)Jenny Kim (6 shared papers)Samuel E. Champer (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature Communications (7 papers)BMC Biology (5 papers)eLife (3 papers)Molecular Ecology (3 papers)PLoS Genetics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jackson Champer
66 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Insect Science 969
- Dermatology 284
- Molecular Biology 2.0k
- Business and International Management 60
- Microbiology 121
Countries citing papers authored by Jackson Champer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jackson Champer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jackson Champer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jackson Champer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jackson Champer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jackson Champer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jackson Champer. The network helps show where Jackson Champer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jackson Champer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 343 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 305 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 295 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 218 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 190 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 143 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 124 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 100 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 96 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 88 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 88 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 87 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 76 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 66 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 64 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 53 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 43 |
About Jackson Champer
Jackson Champer is a scholar working on Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Dermatology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 68 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (42 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (26 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (12 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers), Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (969 citations), Dermatology (284 citations), Molecular Biology (2.0k citations), Business and International Management (60 citations) and Microbiology (121 citations). Jackson Champer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philipp W. Messer, Andrew G. Clark, Omar S. Akbari, Anna B. Buchman, Jingxian Liu, Chen Liu, Jenny Kim, Samuel E. Champer, Riona Reeves and Emily Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, BMC Biology, eLife, Molecular Ecology and PLoS Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.