Samuel C. Wait

697 citations
27 papers · 607 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Samuel C. Wait

26 papers receiving 568 citations

Peers

Samuel C. Wait
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 198
  • Spectroscopy 133
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 39
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 193
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 93
Replace Richard E. Wilde with:
Richard E. Wilde United States
Yuzuru Ooshika Japan
Kunio Fukushima Japan
D. P. Ames United States
Alexandre Novak France
A. Hargreaves United States
A. Campbell Ling United States
Frank D. Verderame United States
H.‐H. Perkampus Germany
William Ε. L. Grossman United States
Samuel C. Wait relative to Richard E. Wilde United States Richard E. Wilde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Richard E. Wilde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel C. Wait

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel C. Wait's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel C. Wait with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel C. Wait more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel C. Wait

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel C. Wait. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel C. Wait. The network helps show where Samuel C. Wait may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Samuel C. Wait, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Samuel C. Wait Line = papers co-authored together Samuel C. Wait links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1961115
2 197099
3 196869
4 197261
5 196658
6 196626
7 197324
8 195721
9 195518
10 196317
11 196716
12 196316
13 196614
14 19687
15 19576
16 19695
17 19715
18 19545
19 19635
20 19624

About Samuel C. Wait

Samuel C. Wait is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Molecular Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 607 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (5 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (5 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Glass properties and applications (3 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (3 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (2 papers) and Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (198 citations), Spectroscopy (133 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (39 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (193 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (93 citations). Samuel C. Wait has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include George J. Janz, D. P. Craig, J. Michael Hollas, A. T. Ward, Stephen E. Wiberley, J. C. Corelli and Michael P. Barnett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Instrumentation Science & Technology, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Quarterly Reviews Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact