Sam Ashman
Impact in
- Development top 5%
- International Development and Aid
- Finance top 10%
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Papers in
-
- Political Economy and Marxism 5
- South African History and Culture 3
- African studies and sociopolitical issues 2
- Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism 2
-
- Economic Theory and Policy 4
- Co-authors
- Ben Fine (5 shared papers)Susan Newman (3 shared papers)Vishnu Padayachee (1 shared paper)John Sender (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Historical Materialism (3 papers)Journal of Southern African Studies (1 paper)Cambridge Review of International Affairs (1 paper)Climate Policy (1 paper)Politics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Sam Ashman
18 papers receiving 220 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Development 28
- Finance 69
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 52
- Business and International Management 8
- Urban Studies 19
Countries citing papers authored by Sam Ashman
This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Ashman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Ashman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Ashman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Ashman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Ashman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Ashman. The network helps show where Sam Ashman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Sam Ashman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 68 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 6 | NUMSA, the Working Class and Socialist Politics in South Africa | 2015 | 6 |
| 7 | South Africa: The Meaning of Marikana | 2012 | 5 |
| 8 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 10 | Systems of Accumulation and the Evolving MEC | 2013 | 4 |
| 11 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 13 | Financialised accumulation and the political economy of state capture | 2019 | 2 |
| 14 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 0 |
About Sam Ashman
Sam Ashman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Public Administration, Finance and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 20 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Economy and Marxism (5 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers), South African History and Culture (3 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (2 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (2 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (2 papers) and Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (28 citations), Finance (69 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (52 citations), Business and International Management (8 citations) and Urban Studies (19 citations). Sam Ashman has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ben Fine, Susan Newman, Vishnu Padayachee and John Sender. Their work appears in journals such as Historical Materialism, Journal of Southern African Studies, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Climate Policy and Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.