S. Zaromb

35 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

S. Zaromb
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Bioengineering 122
  • Electrochemistry 61
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 332
  • Biomedical Engineering 197
  • Polymers and Plastics 47
Replace Gunter Hagen with:
Gunter Hagen Germany
Sayan Dey India
Abbas Shirmardi Iran
A.-K. Hsieh Singapore
Shukuji Asakura Japan
Jiawen Jian China
Chunxiao Yin China
D. J. Pickett United Kingdom
Frank Hovorka United States
Leo B. Kriksunov United States
S. Zaromb relative to Gunter Hagen Germany Gunter Hagen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gunter Hagen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Zaromb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Zaromb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Zaromb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Zaromb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Zaromb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Zaromb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Zaromb. The network helps show where S. Zaromb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside S. Zaromb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Zaromb Line = papers co-authored together S. Zaromb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962153
2 198484
3 196353
4 198536
5 196228
6 198428
7 198619
8 198517
9 199310
10 199810
11 198310
12 19619
13 19838
14 19628
15 19627
16 19626
17 19845
18 19905
19 19835
20 19974

About S. Zaromb

S. Zaromb is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bioengineering, Spectroscopy and Electrochemistry, having authored 36 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (13 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (8 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (6 papers), Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (4 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (2 papers) and Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (122 citations), Electrochemistry (61 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (332 citations), Biomedical Engineering (197 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (47 citations). S. Zaromb has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph R. Stetter, T. Otagawa, Judith Mantell, D. D. Lawson, Donal J. O’Gorman, W.R. Penrose, Jonathan Chang, Lyndon J. Mitnaul, C. Norman Cochran and J.W. Stull. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Separation Science and Technology and Environmental Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact