S. W. PIPE

713 citations
14 papers · 595 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Hematology top 2%
    • Hemophilia Treatment and Research
    • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
    • Hemostasis and retained surgical items

Papers in

    • Hemophilia Treatment and Research 13
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms 2
    • Platelet Disorders and Treatments 2
    • Hemostasis and retained surgical items 1
    • CAR-T cell therapy research 3

S. W. PIPE

14 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers

S. W. PIPE
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Hematology 462
  • Internal Medicine 34
  • Genetics 85
  • Genetics 65
  • Oncology 48
Replace Nadia P. Ewing with:
Nadia P. Ewing United States
Abdullah S. Al Saleh United States
Silvia Lavoretano Italy
Connor Sweeney United Kingdom
Ulrike Buttkereit Germany
Faustino García‐Candel Spain
Victoria R. Nachar United States
Marie Tamagne France
Edwin G. Taft United States
Dieter Brandhorst Germany
S. W. PIPE relative to Nadia P. Ewing United States Nadia P. Ewing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Nadia P. Ewing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. W. PIPE

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. W. PIPE's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. W. PIPE with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. W. PIPE more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. W. PIPE

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. W. PIPE. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. W. PIPE. The network helps show where S. W. PIPE may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. W. PIPE, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. W. PIPE Line = papers co-authored together S. W. PIPE links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2007243
2 200982
3 200571
4 200851
5 202044
6 201128
7 200826
8 201121
9 201116
10 20065
11 20253
12 20062
13 20172
14 20231

About S. W. PIPE

S. W. PIPE is a scholar working on Hematology, Oncology, Physiology, Genetics and Rheumatology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemophilia Treatment and Research (13 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (3 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (2 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers), Hemostasis and retained surgical items (1 paper), Cancer-related gene regulation (1 paper) and Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (462 citations), Internal Medicine (34 citations), Genetics (85 citations), Genetics (65 citations) and Oncology (48 citations). S. W. PIPE has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Donna DiMichele, Elena Santagostino, Georges‐Étienne Rivard, William Keith Hoots, Barbara A. Konkle, Kazuhiro Ogata, Douglas B. Cines, Herbert C. Whinna, X. Long Zheng and Adam C. Cuker. Their work appears in journals such as Haemophilia, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Molecular Therapy and Hämostaseologie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact