S. Squire

626 citations
8 papers · 87 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Hemophilia Treatment and Research
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
    • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Papers in

S. Squire

8 papers receiving 84 citations

Peers

S. Squire
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Hematology 65
  • Internal Medicine 6
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 8
  • Health Informatics 2
  • Genetics 10
Replace Jens Taggeselle with:
Jens Taggeselle Germany
Christof Pohl Germany
Noémie de Gunzburg France
E. Alton Sartor United States
В М Шмелева Russia
Richard Lloyd United Kingdom
Mohammad Ali Hajebrahimi Iran
Ritesh Raichoudhury United States
I. Kontopoulou‐Griva Greece
Michal Nudel Romania
S. Squire relative to Jens Taggeselle Germany Jens Taggeselle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jens Taggeselle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Squire

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Squire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Squire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Squire more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Squire

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Squire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Squire. The network helps show where S. Squire may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Squire, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Squire Line = papers co-authored together S. Squire links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 201828
2 201516
3 201713
4 201511
5 20218
6 20214
7 20184
8 20193

About S. Squire

S. Squire is a scholar working on Hematology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 87 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemophilia Treatment and Research (6 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (1 paper), Vascular Procedures and Complications (1 paper), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (1 paper) and Radiology practices and education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (65 citations), Internal Medicine (6 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (8 citations), Health Informatics (2 citations) and Genetics (10 citations). S. Squire has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Shannon Jackson, Haowei Sun, Michael Recht, Susan Lattimore, Jonathan Roberts, Victoria Price, Katherine Robinson, Sandra Richardson, Kenneth Rockwood and Alfonso Iorio. Their work appears in journals such as Haemophilia, Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, Insights into Imaging and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact