S M Factor

666 citations
11 papers · 577 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

S M Factor

11 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

S M Factor
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Neurology 75
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 119
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 139
  • Neurology 92
  • Physiology 138
Replace Naomi Hino‐Fukuyo with:
Naomi Hino‐Fukuyo Japan
Amal Y. Kentab Saudi Arabia
Peterus Thajeb Taiwan
Norinao Hanyu Japan
Adolf Pou Spain
Nobutsune Ishikawa Japan
Pamela E. Rios Coronado United States
Arthur J. DiPatri United States
Elizabeth Donnachie United States
Aslı Kurne Türkiye
S M Factor relative to Naomi Hino‐Fukuyo Japan Naomi Hino‐Fukuyo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Naomi Hino‐Fukuyo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S M Factor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S M Factor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S M Factor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S M Factor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S M Factor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S M Factor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S M Factor. The network helps show where S M Factor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S M Factor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S M Factor Line = papers co-authored together S M Factor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1994245
2
Structure and function of connective tissue in cardiac muscle: collagen types I and III in endomysial struts and pericellular fibers.
198876
3 199671
4 199566
5
Comparative connective tissue structure-function relationships in biologic pumps.
198859
6 199124
7 200012
8 199810
9 199710
10 19942
11 19962

About S M Factor

S M Factor is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trypanosoma species research and implications (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (2 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (2 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (75 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (119 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (139 citations), Neurology (92 citations) and Physiology (138 citations). S M Factor has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas F. Robinson, Peter Davies, Dennis W. Dickson, Karen H. van Hoeven, Caroline Bevona, Ellen Grober, Howard Crystal, Olga O. Blumenfeld, Leona Cohen‐Gould and M Eghbali. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Acta Neuropathologica, Cardiovascular Pathology, Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases and Journal of Parasitology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact