S. Hoth

939 citations
69 papers · 642 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

S. Hoth

64 papers receiving 604 citations

Peers

S. Hoth
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Sensory Systems 249
  • Otorhinolaryngology 118
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 312
  • Speech and Hearing 72
  • Neurology 89
Replace Gabrielle R. Merchant with:
Gabrielle R. Merchant United States
Dimitris Kikidis Greece
Krzysztof Kochanek Poland
Antoinette Lamprecht-Dinnesen Germany
Gene W. Bratt United States
Guy Lightfoot United Kingdom
W. Wiktor Jędrzejczak Poland
Francisco Javier Cervera‐Paz Spain
Kelly M. Reavis United States
Vernon D. Larson United States
S. Hoth relative to Gabrielle R. Merchant United States Gabrielle R. Merchant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Gabrielle R. Merchant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Hoth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Hoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Hoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Hoth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Hoth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Hoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Hoth. The network helps show where S. Hoth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Hoth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Hoth Line = papers co-authored together S. Hoth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201652
2 200533
3 200526
4 200924
5 201624
6 200422
7 199422
8 201722
9 202020
10 200920
11 201320
12 201719
13 201617
14 200617
15 201616
16 199615
17 199315
18 201514
19 201914
20 200613

About S. Hoth

S. Hoth is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Neurology, Speech and Hearing and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (34 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (29 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (13 papers), Noise Effects and Management (8 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (6 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (249 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (118 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (312 citations), Speech and Hearing (72 citations) and Neurology (89 citations). S. Hoth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Katrin Neumann, T Lenarz, Peter K. Plinkert, J. Müller-Deile, Harald Α. Euler, Ingo Baumann, Roland Mühler, Mark Praetorius, Cornelia von Hagens and Serkan Sertel. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Audiology, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Otology & Neurotology, HNO and ORL.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact