Mark Praetorius

2.1k citations
84 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Praetorius

75 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mark Praetorius
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Sensory Systems 782
  • Otorhinolaryngology 451
  • Neurology 305
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 343
  • Developmental Neuroscience 38
Replace Ryosei Minoda with:
Ryosei Minoda Japan
Hideichi Shinkawa Japan
Samuel P. Gubbels United States
Armağan İncesulu Türkiye
E. H. Huizing Netherlands
Akinori Kashio Japan
Pascal Senn Switzerland
Shi Nae Park South Korea
John C.M.J. de Groot Netherlands
David R. Friedland United States
Mark Praetorius relative to Ryosei Minoda Japan Ryosei Minoda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ryosei Minoda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Praetorius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Praetorius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Praetorius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Praetorius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Praetorius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Praetorius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Praetorius. The network helps show where Mark Praetorius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Praetorius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Praetorius Line = papers co-authored together Mark Praetorius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000160
2 2007119
3 201189
4 201171
5 200670
6 201554
7 199952
8 200951
9
Impact of gender, age, and comorbidities on quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
200746
10 200941
11 200739
12 200737
13 200334
14 200434
15 200232
16 200831
17 201030
18 200229
19 201529
20 200127

About Mark Praetorius

Mark Praetorius is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Otorhinolaryngology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Molecular Biology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (27 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (15 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (12 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (9 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (4 papers), Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers) and Connexins and lens biology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (782 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (451 citations), Neurology (305 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (343 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (38 citations). Mark Praetorius has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Hinrich Staecker, Peter K. Plinkert, Ingo Baumann, Douglas E. Brough, Kim Baker, Christoph Klingmann, Marlies Knipper, P. K. Plinkert, Bernhard Schick and Ulrike Zimmermann. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Audiology and Neurotology and Hearing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact