S. Hampson

2.3k citations
16 papers · 1.9k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

S. Hampson

16 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

S. Hampson
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 343
  • Sensory Systems 88
  • Neurology 149
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 85
Replace Christopher C. Gallen with:
Christopher C. Gallen United States
Tommi Raij United States
J. Huttunen Finland
Burton S. Rosner United States
Antti Korvenoja Finland
E. Kaukoranta Finland
Juliane Britz Switzerland
R. Hari Finland
Vanessa Sluming United Kingdom
Purvis Bedenbaugh United States
S. Hampson relative to Christopher C. Gallen United States Christopher C. Gallen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Christopher C. Gallen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Hampson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Hampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Hampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Hampson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Hampson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Hampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Hampson. The network helps show where S. Hampson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Hampson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Hampson Line = papers co-authored together S. Hampson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1995371
2 1991325
3 1994296
4 1998153
5 1995125
6 1993118
7 1996100
8 199271
9 199670
10 199457
11 199156
12 199438
13 198632
14 199325
15 199714
16
Mismatch field to minor pitch changes in single and paired tones: neuromagnetic source localization from derived fields.
19953

About S. Hampson

S. Hampson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (10 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Music and Audio Processing (2 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (343 citations), Sensory Systems (88 citations), Neurology (149 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (85 citations). S. Hampson has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Christo Pantev, Thomas Elbert, Carsten Eulitz, M. Hoke, Scott Makeig, Róbert Galambos, Gerhard Schuierer, Chantal Verkindt, Olivier Bertrand and Wolfgang Larbig. Their work appears in journals such as Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, Brain Topography, Neuroreport, Neurosurgery and Brain and Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact