S. Fordham

768 citations
8 papers · 626 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

S. Fordham

8 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers

S. Fordham
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 549
  • Aquatic Science 211
  • Global and Planetary Change 295
  • Ecology 202
  • Developmental Biology 5
Replace Stirling Peverell with:
Stirling Peverell Australia
Dean C. Thorburn Australia
Claudine Gibson United States
Santiago A. Barbini Argentina
J. Matías Braccini Australia
Jamie S. Yin Australia
Lawrence R. Beerkircher United States
Michael C. Scholl South Africa
Otto Bismarck Fazzano Gadig Brazil
Dennis Reid Australia
S. Fordham relative to Stirling Peverell Australia Stirling Peverell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stirling Peverell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Fordham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Fordham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Fordham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Fordham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Fordham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Fordham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Fordham. The network helps show where S. Fordham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Fordham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Fordham Line = papers co-authored together S. Fordham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2000287
2
Management of Sharks and Their Relatives
200093
3
Sharks, rays and chimaeras: the status of the Chondrichthyan fishes. Status survey
200577
4 201375
5 201354
6 201935
7
Global Priorities for Conserving Sharks and Rays
20153
8 20122

About S. Fordham

S. Fordham is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Aquatic Science, Ecology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ichthyology and Marine Biology (8 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (7 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (2 papers), Marine and fisheries research (2 papers), Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (2 papers), Marine animal studies overview (1 paper) and Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (549 citations), Aquatic Science (211 citations), Global and Planetary Change (295 citations), Ecology (202 citations) and Developmental Biology (5 citations). S. Fordham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include George H. Burgess, Gregor M. Cailliet, Merry D. Camhi, John A. Musick, Thiemo Werner, D. Michelle McComb, John K. Carlson, John W. Mandelman, Rachel D. Cavanagh and K. Alexandra Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as Fisheries, Journal of Fish Biology, Environmental Conservation, Conservation Physiology and Endangered Species Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact