S. Field

879 citations
28 papers · 611 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

S. Field

28 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

S. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Oncology 118
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 94
  • Emergency Medicine 36
  • General Health Professions 82
  • Applied Psychology 15
Replace Jamil S. Samaan with:
Jamil S. Samaan United States
Marie‐Laure Charpignon United States
Carlos Canelo‐Aybar Spain
Stephen Hearing United Kingdom
Dana T. Lin United States
Georgia Hardavella United Kingdom
Nikhil Panda United States
Lydia R. Maurer United States
Nizar Bhulani United States
Megha Garg United States
S. Field relative to Jamil S. Samaan United States Jamil S. Samaan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jamil S. Samaan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Field. The network helps show where S. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Field Line = papers co-authored together S. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200089
2 199262
3 200147
4 199835
5 199633
6 200232
7 199732
8 200029
9 200127
10 198527
11
Educating Difficult Adolescents: Effective Education for Children in Public Care or with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties
200827
12 199724
13 200419
14 199718
15 199818
16 197418
17 198515
18
College Physics: A Strategic Approach
200612
19 20009
20 19858

About S. Field

S. Field is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 611 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (3 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (2 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (2 papers) and Trauma Management and Diagnosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (118 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (94 citations), Emergency Medicine (36 citations), General Health Professions (82 citations) and Applied Psychology (15 citations). S. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. R. Rutter, M A Richards, Antonio J. Ramírez, Jonathon J. Graham, Michael Calnan, L. Garvican, Kimberley A. Wade, Stirling Bryan, Hilary Bungay and H. M. Saxton. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Radiology, British Journal of Radiology, Emergency Medicine Journal, Health Technology Assessment and Journal of Medical Screening.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact