Ryan Day

698 citations
15 papers · 548 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ryan Day

15 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Ryan Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 176
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 191
  • Physiology 307
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 133
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 65
Replace Sabine Scholle with:
Sabine Scholle Germany
Martin Glasser United States
J. Schmitt Germany
Samuel Genzor Czechia
Michel A. Cramer Bornemann United States
Michael J. Dickel United States
Victor A. Ulibarri United States
Carolyn T. Wells United States
Camila Maria de Melo Brazil
Katia Gagnon Canada
Ryan Day relative to Sabine Scholle Germany Sabine Scholle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sabine Scholle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ryan Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ryan Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryan Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryan Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ryan Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryan Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryan Day. The network helps show where Ryan Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ryan Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ryan Day Line = papers co-authored together Ryan Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2003176
2 200064
3 199958
4 200053
5 200148
6 200442
7 200531
8 199817
9 201716
10 200113
11 199910
12 20039
13
Narcolepsy and other causes of excessive daytime sleepiness.
19997
14
The detection of brief daytime sleep episodes.
19993
15 19991

About Ryan Day

Ryan Day is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Molecular Biology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (7 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (176 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (191 citations), Physiology (307 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (133 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (65 citations). Ryan Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Roth, León Rosenthal, Rebecca Gerhardstein, Mary Lou Syron, Mary Parks, Christopher L. Drake, David W. Hudgel, Peter Guido, Robert M. Carney and Kenneth E. Freedland. Their work appears in journals such as Sleep Medicine, SLEEP, CHEST Journal, Otolaryngology and Nucleic Acids Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact