Ruxia Li

473 citations
31 papers · 348 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ruxia Li

29 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Ruxia Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 131
  • Immunology and Allergy 31
  • Pollution 47
  • Electrochemistry 18
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 10
Replace Ying Peng with:
Ying Peng China
C. Tucker Helmes United States
Julio Gomis-Tena Spain
Haoyue Zhang China
Alok Garg India
Shamim Ahsan Japan
Anurag Kumar United States
Junxian Chen China
Siyu Zhang China
Ruxia Li relative to Ying Peng China Ying Peng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Ying Peng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruxia Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruxia Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruxia Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruxia Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruxia Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruxia Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruxia Li. The network helps show where Ruxia Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruxia Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruxia Li Line = papers co-authored together Ruxia Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202143
2 201436
3 202132
4 202331
5 202327
6 201722
7 202320
8 202119
9 202315
10 202314
11 202013
12 202211
13 20229
14 20167
15 20237
16 20187
17 20227
18 20246
19 20214
20 20234

About Ruxia Li

Ruxia Li is a scholar working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Aerospace Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Energetic Materials and Combustion (8 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (8 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (7 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (5 papers), Heavy metals in environment (4 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (4 papers), Covalent Organic Framework Applications (3 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (131 citations), Immunology and Allergy (31 citations), Pollution (47 citations), Electrochemistry (18 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (10 citations). Ruxia Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Rwanda. Frequent co-authors include Shuwen Li, Honglei Yang, Ruifa Jin, Yi Yang, Yonghua Li, Xiaoyong Liao, Yan Guo, Ru Zhang, Limin Zhao and Wei Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Green Chemistry, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact