Ru‐Wei Lin

403 citations
14 papers · 330 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cell death mechanisms and regulation 3
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 2
    • Bone Metabolism and Diseases 2
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 4

Ru‐Wei Lin

14 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Ru‐Wei Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 9
  • Biophysics 25
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 29
  • Molecular Biology 193
  • Oncology 75
Replace Élisabeth Miot-Noirault with:
Élisabeth Miot-Noirault France
Ailin Zhang China
Sara Ciuffa Italy
Ming-Ling Hsu Taiwan
Ghader Babaei Iran
Katarzyna Szołtysek Poland
Martina Cordella Italy
Takuya Matsui Japan
J. Wahler United States
Gabriela Ion United States
Ru‐Wei Lin relative to Élisabeth Miot-Noirault France Élisabeth Miot-Noirault's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Élisabeth Miot-Noirault · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ru‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ru‐Wei Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ru‐Wei Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ru‐Wei Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ru‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ru‐Wei Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ru‐Wei Lin. The network helps show where Ru‐Wei Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ru‐Wei Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ru‐Wei Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ru‐Wei Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200973
2 201845
3 200430
4 201529
5 201529
6 201928
7 201125
8 200419
9 201814
10 200913
11 202111
12 20225
13 20205
14 20134

About Ru‐Wei Lin

Ru‐Wei Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (4 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (3 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Medicinal Plants (1 paper), Bone health and osteoporosis research (1 paper) and Cancer Research and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (9 citations), Biophysics (25 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (29 citations), Molecular Biology (193 citations) and Oncology (75 citations). Ru‐Wei Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gwo‐Jaw Wang, Chung‐Hwan Chen, Mei‐Ling Ho, Chihuei Wang, Shao‐Hung Hung, Yan‐Hsiung Wang, Chang‐Yih Duh, Ih‐Sheng Chen, Cheng-Jung Ho and Chih‐Chun Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Death Discovery, Cell Cycle, Bioelectromagnetics, Planta Medica and European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact