Ruth Young
Impact in
- Archeology top 5%
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Space and Planetary Science top 5%
- Archaeological Research and Protection
Papers in
- Anthropology 21
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 8
- Anthropological Studies and Insights 6
- Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies 5
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 4
- Archeology 18
- Ancient Near East History 6
- Co-authors
- Robin Coningham (13 shared papers)Ming Nie (1 shared paper)Mark Pluciennik (1 shared paper)Palitha Edırısıngha (1 shared paper)Andrew Reid (1 shared paper)Gavin Gillmore (4 shared papers)C. M Batt (4 shared papers)Hojjat Darabi (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Iran (5 papers)Antiquity (5 papers)Post-Medieval Archaeology (2 papers)South Asian Studies (2 papers)Archaeological Dialogues (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIranSri Lanka
In The Last Decade
Ruth Young
42 papers receiving 410 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Archeology 45
- Space and Planetary Science 37
- Paleontology 176
- Archeology 154
- Anthropology 144
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Young
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Young more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Young
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Young. The network helps show where Ruth Young may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 106 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 38 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 6 |
About Ruth Young
Ruth Young is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Paleontology, Political Science and International Relations and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (15 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (11 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (8 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers), Ancient Near East History (6 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (5 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (5 papers) and Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (45 citations), Space and Planetary Science (37 citations), Paleontology (176 citations), Archeology (154 citations) and Anthropology (144 citations). Ruth Young has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Robin Coningham, Ming Nie, Mark Pluciennik, Palitha Edırısıngha, Andrew Reid, Gavin Gillmore, C. M Batt, Hojjat Darabi, Paul Newson and Randolph E. Donahue. Their work appears in journals such as Iran, Antiquity, Post-Medieval Archaeology, South Asian Studies and Archaeological Dialogues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.