Ruth Webster

82 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Ruth Webster
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Family Practice 283
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 92
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 526
  • Economics and Econometrics 200
  • Applied Psychology 31
Replace Jon-David Schwalm with:
Jon-David Schwalm Canada
Bart J. F. van den Bemt Netherlands
Carla A. Sueta United States
Tom Briffa Australia
Kevin Mc Namara Australia
Jayanti Mukherjee United States
Eric J. MacLaughlin United States
Javier Valero‐Elizondo United States
Andreas Zeller Switzerland
Andrew M. Peterson United States
Ruth Webster relative to Jon-David Schwalm Canada Jon-David Schwalm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Jon-David Schwalm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Webster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Webster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Webster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Webster. The network helps show where Ruth Webster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Webster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Webster Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Webster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009102
2 201297
3 201296
4 201095
5 200992
6 200480
7 200779
8 201772
9 201268
10 199853
11 201449
12 201645
13 201744
14 201943
15 201742
16 201942
17 201839
18 200739
19 201537
20 202132

About Ruth Webster

Ruth Webster is a scholar working on Family Practice, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medication Adherence and Compliance (28 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (12 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (10 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (6 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (283 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (92 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (526 citations), Economics and Econometrics (200 citations) and Applied Psychology (31 citations). Ruth Webster has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Rodgers, Anushka Patel, Emma Heeley, David Peiris, Oyere K. Onuma, José M. Castellano, Simon Thom, Rohina Joshi, Mark Woodward and Alan Cass. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, Global Heart, BMJ Open, Journal of Hypertension and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact