Ruth Parry

55 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Ruth Parry
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Rehabilitation 402
  • Occupational Therapy 83
  • General Health Professions 429
  • Language and Linguistics 202
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 56
Replace Emma Power with:
Emma Power Australia
Maude Rittman United States
Sarah J. Wallace Australia
Lisa Roberts United Kingdom
Tanya Rose Australia
Anne Hesketh United Kingdom
Deborah Hersh Australia
Fred Louckx Belgium
Shirley Thomas United Kingdom
Hugh G. Dickson Australia
Ruth Parry relative to Emma Power Australia Emma Power's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Emma Power · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Parry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Parry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Parry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Parry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Parry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Parry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Parry. The network helps show where Ruth Parry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Parry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Parry Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Parry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999181
2 1996131
3 1999112
4 2004104
5 2014101
6 201766
7 201666
8 201565
9 200862
10 200958
11 201658
12 201344
13 200442
14 201842
15 201641
16 201340
17 201930
18
Rapid evidence review: pathways focused on the dying phase in end of life care and their key components
201329
19 202128
20 201827

About Ruth Parry

Ruth Parry is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Language and Linguistics, Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (12 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (11 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (9 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (9 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (402 citations), Occupational Therapy (83 citations), General Health Professions (429 citations), Language and Linguistics (202 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (56 citations). Ruth Parry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nadina B. Lincoln, Victoria Land, Jane Seymour, Marco Pino, Catherine Vass, Christina Faull, Avril Drummond, Marion Walker, Phillip Whitehead and Laura Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Physiotherapy, Research on Language and Social Interaction, Clinical Rehabilitation and BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact