Ruth Halliday
Impact in
-
- Bone fractures and treatments
-
- Hip and Femur Fractures
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Papers in
- Surgery 12
- Hip and Femur Fractures 6
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 5
- Stoma care and complications 1
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 1
-
- Bone fractures and treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Michael Kelly (2 shared papers)Peter Hull (2 shared papers)Andrew Gray (2 shared papers)Tim Chesser (4 shared papers)James Smith (1 shared paper)Rory Morrison (1 shared paper)T.J.S. Chesser (3 shared papers)Nathanael Ahearn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Injury (3 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)The Bone & Joint Journal (2 papers)Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1 paper)Emergency Medicine Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ruth Halliday
15 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Epidemiology 113
- Surgery 142
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 20
- Emergency Medicine 12
- Urology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Halliday
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Halliday more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Halliday
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Halliday. The network helps show where Ruth Halliday may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Halliday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 7 | DISTAL FEMORAL FRACTURES: THE NEED TO REVIEW STANDARDS OF CARE | 2018 | 13 |
| 8 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 1 |
About Ruth Halliday
Ruth Halliday is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hip and Femur Fractures (6 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (5 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Stoma care and complications (1 paper), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (113 citations), Surgery (142 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (20 citations), Emergency Medicine (12 citations) and Urology (8 citations). Ruth Halliday has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kelly, Peter Hull, Andrew Gray, Tim Chesser, James Smith, Rory Morrison, T.J.S. Chesser, Nathanael Ahearn, Andrew Oppy and Stephen Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Injury, BMJ Open, The Bone & Joint Journal, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Emergency Medicine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.