James Smith
Impact in
-
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Hip and Femur Fractures
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Papers in
- Surgery 14
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment 4
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 4
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 4
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 3
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 3
-
- Bone fractures and treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Roger C. Mixter (1 shared paper)Ian T. Jackson (1 shared paper)Rory Morrison (1 shared paper)Peter Hull (1 shared paper)James R. D. Murray (3 shared papers)Andrew Gray (1 shared paper)Ruth Halliday (1 shared paper)Andrew Porteous (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Injury (4 papers)Annals of Plastic Surgery (2 papers)The Knee (2 papers)Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (1 paper)Journal of Emergency Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
James Smith
15 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Surgery 271
- Rehabilitation 20
- Epidemiology 96
- Sensory Systems 10
- Otorhinolaryngology 8
Countries citing papers authored by James Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of James Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Smith. The network helps show where James Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 0 |
About James Smith
James Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, Genetics and Emergency Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (4 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (4 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (4 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (3 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (3 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (271 citations), Rehabilitation (20 citations), Epidemiology (96 citations), Sensory Systems (10 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (8 citations). James Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Roger C. Mixter, Ian T. Jackson, Rory Morrison, Peter Hull, James R. D. Murray, Andrew Gray, Ruth Halliday, Andrew Porteous, Michael Kelly and James Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Injury, Annals of Plastic Surgery, The Knee, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy and Journal of Emergency Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.