James Smith

675 citations
18 papers · 437 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James Smith

17 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

James Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Artificial Intelligence 179
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 95
  • Atmospheric Science 67
  • Geophysics 36
  • Global and Planetary Change 53
Replace Fanqiang Lin with:
Fanqiang Lin China
Xiaoxuan Zhang China
Chuyao Luo China
Yujie Zhang China
Christophe Millet France
Zhuo Zhang China
Rodrigo S. Ferreira Brazil
Masaaki Iiyama Japan
James Smith relative to Fanqiang Lin China Fanqiang Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31×
Fanqiang Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Smith. The network helps show where James Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Smith Line = papers co-authored together James Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2021109
2 201879
3 201861
4 200638
5
Summary of results - Joint NTGS - AGSO Age Determination Program 1999-2001
200138
6 201932
7 200123
8 202121
9 202313
10 20156
11 20186
12
Unsupervised Continual Learning and Self-Taught Associative Memory Hierarchies
20193
13 20242
14 20182
15 20112
16 20231
17 19791
18 20230

About James Smith

James Smith is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Atmospheric Science and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (3 papers), Global Health and Surgery (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Machine Learning and ELM (2 papers), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (2 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research (1 paper) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (179 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (95 citations), Atmospheric Science (67 citations), Geophysics (36 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (53 citations). James Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Bogdan M. Wilamowski, Bo Wu, Zsolt Kira, Yen-Chang Hsu, Hongxia Jin, Yilin Shen, Michael E. Baginski, Daniel R. Chavas, Ning Lin and Kerry Emanuel. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, ISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Anatomy and IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact