Ruth Groff

21 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

Ruth Groff
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • History and Philosophy of Science 39
  • Philosophy 52
  • Sociology and Political Science 135
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 20
Replace Nigel Pleasants with:
Nigel Pleasants United Kingdom
Alan Nelson United States
Hans‐Georg Moeller Macao
Sharon Crasnow United States
Brian Epstein United States
John W. Burbıdge Canada
Douglas Odegard Canada
David F. Bell United States
Sundar Sarukkai India
Éric Alliez France
Ruth Groff relative to Nigel Pleasants United Kingdom Nigel Pleasants's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Nigel Pleasants · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Groff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Groff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Groff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Groff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Groff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Groff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Groff. The network helps show where Ruth Groff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Groff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Groff Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Groff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200487
2
Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism
201348
3 200023
4
Ontology Revisited: Metaphysics in Social and Political Philosophy
201222
5 202216
6 201613
7 201612
8 201211
9 20238
10 20215
11 20123
12 20093
13 20052
14 19972
15 20162
16 20152
17 20212
18 20041
19 20111
20 20141

About Ruth Groff

Ruth Groff is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Critical Realism in Sociology (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (39 citations), Philosophy (52 citations), Sociology and Political Science (135 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (20 citations). Ruth Groff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include John Greco, Jamie Morgan, Dave Elder‐Vass, John Roberts, Caroline New, Frédéric Vandenberghe and Leigh Price. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Critical Realism, Synthese, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy of the Social Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact