Ruth E. Mitchell

5.7k citations
52 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth E. Mitchell

49 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ruth E. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Biological Psychiatry 72
  • Dermatology 168
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 248
  • Genetics 327
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
Replace Anna Papadopoulou with:
Anna Papadopoulou Greece
Justine A. Ellis Australia
Gianluca Bagnato Italy
Takao Akama Japan
Krista Dienger United States
Peter H.R. Green United States
D H Felix United Kingdom
Helen I. Joller‐Jemelka Switzerland
Harissios Vliagoftis Canada
D. Williams United States
Ruth E. Mitchell relative to Anna Papadopoulou Greece Anna Papadopoulou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Anna Papadopoulou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Mitchell. The network helps show where Ruth E. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019178
2 2020153
3 1967141
4 201791
5 202379
6 202279
7 202168
8 201258
9 196352
10 199141
11 201936
12 202335
13 202134
14 202133
15 196827
16 201925
17 197520
18 201920
19 202119
20 202216

About Ruth E. Mitchell

Ruth E. Mitchell is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Dermatology and Oncology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (8 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (5 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (5 papers), Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide (3 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (3 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers) and melanin and skin pigmentation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (72 citations), Dermatology (168 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (248 citations), Genetics (327 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations). Ruth E. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include George Davey Smith, Nicholas J. Timpson, Adil Harroud, J. Brent Richards, Tom Dudding, Vincenzo Forgetta, Lavinia Paternoster, Despoina Manousaki, Simon Haworth and Golam M. Khandaker. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Australasian Journal of Dermatology, PLoS Medicine, PLoS ONE and American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact