Ruth Bishop
Impact in
- Parasitology top 2%
- Vector-borne infectious diseases
-
- Vector-Borne Animal Diseases
Papers in
- Surgery 3
- Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders 3
-
- Vector-borne infectious diseases 3
- Co-authors
- Vishvanath Nene (1 shared paper)Malcolm J. Gardner (1 shared paper)A.J. Musoke (1 shared paper)P.R. Spooner (2 shared papers)George W. Lubega (1 shared paper)Christopher Oura (1 shared paper)A. Tait (1 shared paper)Rohit Shankar (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (2 papers)Parasitology (2 papers)BJPsych Open (2 papers)Experimental Parasitology (1 paper)International Journal of Medical Informatics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomKenyaItaly
In The Last Decade
Ruth Bishop
7 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Parasitology 222
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 158
- Infectious Diseases 121
- Insect Science 73
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 6
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Bishop. The network helps show where Ruth Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 209 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 0 |
About Ruth Bishop
Ruth Bishop is a scholar working on Surgery, Parasitology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Gastroenterology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders (3 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (3 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (2 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper) and Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (222 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (158 citations), Infectious Diseases (121 citations), Insect Science (73 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (6 citations). Ruth Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Kenya and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Vishvanath Nene, Malcolm J. Gardner, A.J. Musoke, P.R. Spooner, George W. Lubega, Christopher Oura, A. Tait, Rohit Shankar, Richard Laugharne and Amy M. Russell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Parasitology, BJPsych Open, Experimental Parasitology and International Journal of Medical Informatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.