Russell E.A. Smith

2.1k citations
34 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Russell E.A. Smith

34 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Russell E.A. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 873
  • Internal Medicine 51
  • Biochemistry 61
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 172
  • Physiology 196
Replace D. Ngo with:
D. Ngo Australia
Ho‐Joong Youn South Korea
José A. Barrabés Spain
Katsuya Onishi Japan
Darae Ko United States
Takahiro Hayashi Japan
Seimi Satomi‐Kobayashi Japan
Laurence Dewachter Belgium
Xing L. Wang Australia
Alan Bagnall United Kingdom
Russell E.A. Smith relative to D. Ngo Australia D. Ngo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
D. Ngo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Russell E.A. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Russell E.A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Russell E.A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Russell E.A. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Russell E.A. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Russell E.A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Russell E.A. Smith. The network helps show where Russell E.A. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Russell E.A. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Russell E.A. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Russell E.A. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994184
2 2011162
3 1994160
4 2012153
5 2007138
6 2007112
7 1999106
8 201052
9 197250
10 199147
11 200846
12 199243
13 201029
14 200629
15 199528
16 200928
17 201127
18 199723
19 196620
20 201119

About Russell E.A. Smith

Russell E.A. Smith is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (12 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (3 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (873 citations), Internal Medicine (51 citations), Biochemistry (61 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (172 citations) and Physiology (196 citations). Russell E.A. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francisco Leyva, Paul Foley, Shajil Chalil, John F. Martin, Heather Giles, Salvador Moncada, Berthold Stegemann, Kayvan Khadjooi, Angelo Auricchio and Karim Ratib. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Heart, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, EP Europace and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact