Rudolf Repges

31 papers receiving 977 citations

Peers

Rudolf Repges
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 99
  • Food Science 189
  • Pharmacology 86
  • Pharmacology 145
  • Molecular Biology 378
Replace Mi Hye Kim with:
Mi Hye Kim South Korea
Na Chen China
G. Rai India
Jiaqi Wu China
Areejit Samal India
Ruixin Zhu China
Xueqing Chen China
Zhanli Wang China
Hiroaki Nishimura Japan
Rudolf Repges relative to Mi Hye Kim South Korea Mi Hye Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Mi Hye Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rudolf Repges

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rudolf Repges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rudolf Repges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rudolf Repges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rudolf Repges

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rudolf Repges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rudolf Repges. The network helps show where Rudolf Repges may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rudolf Repges, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rudolf Repges Line = papers co-authored together Rudolf Repges links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003372
2 2007195
3 2001152
4 1997105
5 199775
6 197629
7 199721
8
Rapid diagnostic DNA cytometry with an automatic microscope and a TV image-analysis system.
198418
9 199715
10 19689
11 19968
12 19677
13 19977
14 20086
15 19654
16 19554
17 19684
18 19903
19 19692
20 19652

About Rudolf Repges

Rudolf Repges is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Organic Chemistry and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (2 papers), Medical and Health Sciences Research (2 papers) and AI in cancer detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (99 citations), Food Science (189 citations), Pharmacology (86 citations), Pharmacology (145 citations) and Molecular Biology (378 citations). Rudolf Repges has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Dethlefsen, Gratiana Steinkamp, Uwe R. Juergens, H. Vetter, Adrian Gillissen, Thomas Lehmann, Harald Vogelsang, Frank Seifert, Jörg Fleischhauer and Gerhard Raabe. Their work appears in journals such as Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie, Chirality, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Respiratory Medicine and Phytomedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact