Ruben Amarasingham

23 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Ruben Amarasingham
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Health Information Management 445
  • Health Informatics 129
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 124
  • Emergency Medicine 277
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 33
Replace John F. Hurdle with:
John F. Hurdle United States
Patricia Kipnis United States
Vitaly Herasevich United States
Justina Sam Canada
Joseph Kannry United States
Lemuel R. Waitman United States
Rajeev Chaudhry United States
Paul Dexter United States
James F. Lloyd United States
Omar Badawi United States
Ruben Amarasingham relative to John F. Hurdle United States John F. Hurdle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
John F. Hurdle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruben Amarasingham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruben Amarasingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruben Amarasingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruben Amarasingham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruben Amarasingham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruben Amarasingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruben Amarasingham. The network helps show where Ruben Amarasingham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruben Amarasingham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruben Amarasingham Line = papers co-authored together Ruben Amarasingham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010360
2 2009258
3 2014182
4 2012175
5 2014126
6 201398
7 201373
8 201557
9 201653
10 201352
11 201250
12 201648
13 201634
14 201330
15 201426
16
Clinical Information Technologies and Inpatient Outcomes
200924
17 200823
18 200712
19 200610
20 20159

About Ruben Amarasingham

Ruben Amarasingham is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (6 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (5 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (445 citations), Health Informatics (129 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (124 citations), Emergency Medicine (277 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (33 citations). Ruben Amarasingham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Chris Clark, Ethan A. Halm, Marie Diener‐West, Neil R. Powe, Darrell J. Gaskin, Laura Plantinga, Billy J. Moore, Bin Xie, Ying Ma and Mark H. Drazner. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Health Affairs, Medical Care, Journal of General Internal Medicine and JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact