Royal E. Shanks
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology top 5%
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Papers in
-
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 4
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 2
-
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research 4
- Climate change and permafrost 3
- Tree-ring climate responses 2
- Co-authors
- Frank W. Woods (1 shared paper)Jerry S. Olson (1 shared paper)Edward E. C. Clebsch (3 shared papers)James V. Drew (2 shared papers)R. J. McCracken (1 shared paper)J. C. F. Tedrow (1 shared paper)C. E. Olmsted (1 shared paper)W. D. Billings (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ecology (7 papers)Science (2 papers)BioScience (1 paper)Ecological Monographs (1 paper)Soil Science Society of America Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Royal E. Shanks
16 papers receiving 505 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 320
- Ecology 340
- Global and Planetary Change 262
- Ecological Modeling 38
- Soil Science 81
Countries citing papers authored by Royal E. Shanks
This map shows the geographic impact of Royal E. Shanks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Royal E. Shanks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal E. Shanks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Royal E. Shanks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Royal E. Shanks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Royal E. Shanks. The network helps show where Royal E. Shanks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Royal E. Shanks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1959 | 143 | |
| 2 | 1955 | 142 | |
| 3 | 1954 | 136 | |
| 4 | 1961 | 108 | |
| 5 | 1954 | 66 | |
| 6 | 1968 | 34 | |
| 7 | 1958 | 33 | |
| 8 | 1962 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1956 | 28 | |
| 10 | 1953 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1965 | 21 | |
| 12 | 1954 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1962 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1964 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1967 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1953 | 2 |
About Royal E. Shanks
Royal E. Shanks is a scholar working on Plant Science, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Environmental Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (4 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers), Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Climate change and permafrost (3 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (2 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (2 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (320 citations), Ecology (340 citations), Global and Planetary Change (262 citations), Ecological Modeling (38 citations) and Soil Science (81 citations). Royal E. Shanks has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank W. Woods, Jerry S. Olson, Edward E. C. Clebsch, James V. Drew, R. J. McCracken, J. C. F. Tedrow, C. E. Olmsted, W. D. Billings, John R. Tester and Robert B. Platt. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Science, BioScience, Ecological Monographs and Soil Science Society of America Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.