Rose McDermott

130 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Rose McDermott
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • General Decision Sciences 186
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.3k
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.3k
  • Gender Studies 483
  • Safety Research 421
Replace Philip Pettit with:
Philip Pettit Australia
Richard Ned Lebow United States
Jeffrey Z. Rubin United States
Dean G. Pruitt United States
Eugene Borgida United States
Barry Markovsky United States
Paul J. Zak United States
John R. Hibbing United States
Robb Willer United States
Ravi Iyer United States
Rose McDermott relative to Philip Pettit Australia Philip Pettit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Philip Pettit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rose McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose McDermott. The network helps show where Rose McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rose McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose McDermott Line = papers co-authored together Rose McDermott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 143 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008271
2 2009263
3 2004211
4 2002193
5 2009172
6 1998158
7 2004154
8 2006144
9 2002121
10 2009107
11 2009105
12 2012103
13 200799
14 200592
15 201491
16 200471
17 200670
18 201167
19 201664
20 201260

About Rose McDermott

Rose McDermott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 143 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (31 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (17 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (12 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (11 papers) and Theology and Canon Law Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (186 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.3k citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.3k citations), Gender Studies (483 citations) and Safety Research (421 citations). Rose McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Hatemi, James Druckman, Jonathan Cowden, Dominic Johnson, Dustin Tingley, Giovanni Frazzetto, John Gerring, Rawi Abdelal, Stephen Peter Rosen and James H. Fowler. Their work appears in journals such as PS Political Science & Politics, Political Psychology, Intelligence & National Security, Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology and Foreign Policy Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact