Peter Hatemi

6.2k citations
96 papers · 3.6k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Hatemi

94 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Peter Hatemi
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 735
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.3k
  • Social Psychology 1.0k
  • Communication 298
  • Applied Psychology 162
Replace John R. Alford with:
John R. Alford United States
Christopher T. Dawes United States
Mark J. Brandt Netherlands
Matthew Feinberg United States
Mina Cikara United States
Jack Glaser United States
Samuel R. Sommers United States
Thierry Devos United States
Jennifer L. Eberhardt United States
Serge Guimond France
Peter Hatemi relative to John R. Alford United States John R. Alford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John R. Alford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hatemi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hatemi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hatemi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hatemi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hatemi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hatemi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hatemi. The network helps show where Peter Hatemi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hatemi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Hatemi Line = papers co-authored together Peter Hatemi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008364
2 2011151
3 2009144
4 2011135
5 2019122
6 2010117
7 2016116
8 2012104
9 2017101
10 200796
11 200995
12 200894
13 201494
14 200992
15 201192
16 200987
17 201171
18 201168
19 201567
20 200864

About Peter Hatemi

Peter Hatemi is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Genetics and Clinical Psychology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (44 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (21 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (20 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (11 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (11 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (10 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (735 citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.3k citations), Social Psychology (1.0k citations), Communication (298 citations) and Applied Psychology (162 citations). Peter Hatemi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rose McDermott, Lindon J. Eaves, Nicholas G. Martin, Sarah E. Medland, John R. Alford, John R. Hibbing, Kevin B. Smith, Brad Verhulst, Charles Crabtree and Christopher Ojeda. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Political Science, PS Political Science & Politics, Twin Research and Human Genetics, Personality and Individual Differences and Political Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact