Peter Hatemi

6.2k citations
103 papers · 4.0k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Hatemi

102 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Peter Hatemi
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 813
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.5k
  • Communication 328
  • Applied Psychology 178
Replace Christopher T. Dawes with:
Christopher T. Dawes United States
Mark J. Brandt Netherlands
Mina Cikara United States
Jennifer L. Eberhardt United States
Jack Glaser United States
Samuel R. Sommers United States
Serge Guimond France
Thierry Devos United States
Nour Kteily United States
Curtis D. Hardin United States
Peter Hatemi relative to Christopher T. Dawes United States Christopher T. Dawes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christopher T. Dawes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hatemi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hatemi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hatemi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hatemi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hatemi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hatemi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hatemi. The network helps show where Peter Hatemi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hatemi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Hatemi Line = papers co-authored together Peter Hatemi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008403
2 2011167
3 2009154
4 2011140
5 2010128
6 2019126
7 2016121
8 2012115
9 2008111
10 2014111
11 2007110
12 2009105
13 2017103
14 201199
15 200997
16 200997
17 201181
18 201178
19 200877
20 201573

About Peter Hatemi

Peter Hatemi is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Genetics and Clinical Psychology, having authored 103 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (45 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (22 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (21 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (11 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (11 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (11 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (813 citations), Social Psychology (1.1k citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.5k citations), Communication (328 citations) and Applied Psychology (178 citations). Peter Hatemi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Rose McDermott, Lindon J. Eaves, Nicholas G. Martin, Sarah E. Medland, John R. Alford, John R. Hibbing, Kevin B. Smith, Brad Verhulst, Matthew V. Hibbing and Christopher Ojeda. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Political Science, PS Political Science & Politics, Twin Research and Human Genetics, Political Psychology and The Journal of Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact